change language:

Publications and references

Publications co-edited by scientists active in 9.05.04

Balest, J., Hrib, M., Dobšinská, Z., & Paletto, A. (2017). The formulation of the National Forest Programme in the Czech Republic: A qualitative survey. Forest Policy and Economics 89: 16-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117301144

Blicharska, M. & Van Herzele, A. (2015). What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Białowieża Forest in Poland. Forest Policy and Economics 57: 22-30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934115000726

Brescancin, F., Dobšinská, Z., De Meo, I., Šálka, J., & Paletto, A. (2017). Analysis of stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics 78: 107-115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117301648

Brukas, V., Mizaras, S. & Mizaraitė, D. (2015). Economic Forest Sustainability: Comparison between Lithuania and Sweden, Forests 6(1): 47-64. http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/1/47

Brukas, V. (2015). New World, Old Ideas—A Narrative of the Lithuanian Forestry Transition. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17(4): 495-515. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1523908X.2014.993023#.VM5BJca6VNI

Brukas, V., Stanislovaitis, A., Kavaliauskas, M. & Gaizutis, A. (2018). Protecting or destructing? Local perceptions of environmental consideration in Lithuanian forestry. Land Use Policy 79: 1014 – 1023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837716304495

Chudy, R., Stevanov, M., Krott, M. (2016). Strategic options for state forest institutions in Poland: evaluation by the 3L Model and ways ahead. International Forestry Review 18(4): 387-411. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2016/00000018/00000004/art00001

Egan A.R., Keeton, W.S., Danks, C.M., Soloviy, I., Zia, A. (2017).  Forest carbon projects in the Ukrainian Carpathians: an assessment of potential community impacts and benefits. Annals of Forest Research, 60(1): 3-17.

Halder P, Paladinić E, Stevanov M, Orlović S, Hokkanen T, Pelkonen P (2014). Energy Wood Production from Private Forests–Private Forest Owners' Perceptions and Attitudes in Croatia and Serbia, Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 35: 515-526. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114002652

Hoogstra, M., Brukas, V., & Wallin, I. (2017) Multiple-use forestry as a boundary object: from a shared ideal to multiple realities. Land Use Policy 68: 247-258. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837715302623

Jarsky, V., Dobsinska, Z., Hrib, M., Oliva J (2018). Restitution of forest property in the Czech Republic and Slovakia – common beginnings with different outcomes? Forestry Journal 64(3-4): 195 – 206. https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2017-0045

Keeton ,W. S. , Angelstam, P. K.,  Bihun, Yu., Chernyavskyy, M. , Crow, S. M. , Deyneka, A. , Elbakidze, M. , J. Farley, Kovalyshyn, V., Kruhlov, I. , B. Mahura, S. Myklush,. Nunery, J. S.,  Soloviy,  I.,   Zahvoyska, L. (2015). Sustainable forest management alternatives for the Carpathian Mountains with a focus on Ukraine.  In: J. Kozak, K. Ostapowicz, A. Bytnerowicz, B. Wyżga (eds.) The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability, Springer, pp.331-352.https://www.afrjournal.org/index.php/afr/article/view/718

Krajter Ostoic, S., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, S., Vuletic, D., Stevanov, M., Zivojinovic, I., Mutabdzija-Becirovic, S., Lazarevic, J., Stojanova, B., Blagojevic, D., Stojanovska, M., Nevenic, R., Pezdevsek Malovrh, S. (2017) Citizen satisfaction with urban forests and green space: results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 23: 93-103.   http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866715300169

Makrickiene, E., Brukas, V., Brodrechtova, Y., Mozgeris, G., Sedmák, R., Šálka, J. (2019) From command-and-control to good forest governance: A critical interpretive analysis of Lithuania and Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics 109, 102 -124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102024

Melnykovych, M., Nijnik, M., Soloviy, I., Nijnik, A., Sarkki,S., Bihun,  Yu. (2017). Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world. Science of the Total Environment 613-614:894-906.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717317680

Mozgeris, G., Kavaliauskas, M., Brukas, V. and Stanislovaitis, A., (2019). Assessment of timber supply under alternative contextual scenarios. Forest Policy and Economics, 103: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.002

Mozgeris, G., Brukas, V., Stanislovaitis, A., Kavaliauskas, M., & Palicinas, M. (2017). Owner mapping for forest scenario modelling - A Lithuanian case study. Forest Policy and Economics 85(2): 235 – 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.002

Niedziałkowski, K., Blicharska, M., Mikusiński, G., & Jędrzejewska, B. (2014). Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park. Land Use Policy 38, 314-329. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837713002639

Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Kaimre, P., Vahter, T. (2014). Motives and Incentives for Joining Forest Owner Associations in Estonia. Small-scale Forestry, 13 (1), 19−33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3

Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Paluots, T. (2014). Management Motives of Estonian Private Forest Owners. Forest Policy and Economics, 42: 8−14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.02.007

Põllumäe, P., Lilleleht, A., Korjus, H. (2016). Institutional barriers in forest owners' cooperation: The case of Estonia. Forest Policy and Economics, 65: 9−16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.01.005

Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H. (2017). Estonian Private Forestry: a Review of Research and Developments. Baltic Forestry 23(3): 724-733.

Sarvašova, Z., Balikova, K., Dobsinska, Z., Sterbova, K., (2019) Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services Across Europe – Main Approaches and Examples from Slovakia. Ekologia 38(2): 154 – 165.

Sarvašová, Z., Dobšinská, Z., Šálka, J. (2014). Public participation in sustainable forestry: the case of forest planning in Slovakia. iForest 7: 414-422. http://www.sisef.it/iforest/abstract/?id=ifor1174-007

Sarvašová, Z., Zivojinovic, I., Weiss, G., Dobšinská, Z., Drăgoi, M., Gál, J., Jarský, V., Mizaraite, D., Põllumäe, P., Šálka, J., Schiberna, E., Šišák, L., Wolfslehner, B., Zalite, Z., Zalitis, T. (2015). Forest owner associations in the Central and Eastern European region. Small-scale forestry. 14(2): 217-232. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5

Stanislovaitis, A., Brukas, V., Kavaliauskas, M., & Mozgeris, G. (2015). Forest owner is more than her goal: a qualitative typology of Lithuanian owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(5): 478-491.  http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02827581.2014.998706#.VM5DhMa6VNI

Stevanov, M., Krott, M., Curman, M., Krajter Ostoic, S., Stojanovski, V. (2018). The (new) role of state forest institutions in Western Balkans. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 48(8): 898-912, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0395

Šálka, J., Dobšinská, Z., Hricová, Z. (2016). Factors of political power — The example of forest owner associations in Slovakia. Forest policy and economics, 68: 88-89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934115300034

Šálka, J., Dobsinska, Z., & Hubo, C. (2016). Relations between forestry and nature conservation The example of Slovakia. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung187(1-2): 25-36.

Štěrbová, M., Šalka, J., Sarvašova, Z. (2018). How does the innovation system in the Slovak forestry service sector work? Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 189(1-2): 16-29.

Štěrbová, M., Loučanová, E., Paluš, H., Ivan, Ľ., & Šálka, J. (2016). Innovation strategy in Slovak forest contractor firms—A SWOT analysis. Forests7(6): 118.

Štěrbová, M., Loučanová, E., Šálka, J.,Paluš, H. (2014). Regional innovation paradoxes of forestry contractor firms in Slovakia. In: Investments to forests and forest based production: scientific book. Zagreb. WoodEMA, 33-57.


Conference materials